Monday, February 10, 2014

River Song--Enough, Sweetie

River Song—Hello Enough, Sweetie


            Steven Moffat would most likely tell you River Song’s purpose in life, other than interjecting “spoilers,” and “hello, sweetie,” into conversation with as much frequency as is physically possible, is killing the Doctor, due to her, of course very unfair and completely uncontrollable, brainwashing at the hands of the Silence.  I disagree.  River Song’s purpose in life, from her point of view, is very simple—marry the Doctor.  In the form of Mels, she openly idolizes the Doctor (“why did the Titanic sink?”  “Because the Doctor didn’t save it.”) and insists, from a very young age, that she’s going to marry him.  Moffat plays this off as two separate sides of River at battle with each other in an attempt to keep her mysterious and confusing, when, in reality, River is nothing more than a little girl obsessed with marrying this supposedly great man named the Doctor she’s never even met.   From that point on, the prospect of their marriage is no longer a question in River Song’s young mind; it is a fact.

            And it is, isn’t it?  From that very first appearance, when the Doctor still had Ten’s hair face, she whispers the one thing to him that only his wife would know—his true name.  Ten looks almost appalled at her knowing this information, sharply disappointed in his future self for slipping this invaluable information to this archeologist, of all people.  Disturbed he may be, but confused he most certainly is.  Despite the fact that he looks none-too-pleased that this particular woman knows his name, she did just whisper it to him.  However he may feel about it, she knows his deepest secret.  He now knows where this particular path ends—he will marry River Song, this has just been made an incontrovertible truth, a fixed point. 

            With this, River introduces a new sort of paradox, for lack of a better term, to the Doctor Whoiverse, one which makes me despise her and question the objectivity of her actions from this point forward.  If you know about a future event—for instance, a marriage—is it even possible for that event to come to passing in an organic way?  Or does the telling of the secret make it happen—make it inescapable?  It’s a sort of handcuffing yourself to the future.  By telling the Doctor that he will marry her some day, she seals his fate, just as reading of Amy’s death signs her death certificate. 

            But this new paradox is just the tip of the River Song iceberg.  Her treatment of Ten, as opposed to Eleven, always strikes me when I re-watch the Silence in the Library two-parter.  She recognizes him, of course, due to her nifty journal, but she can’t quite get a grasp for how to run him.  Adamantly and repeatedly, she asks him to do things and, upon learning that he isn’t capable of the task, she insists that the future, and apparently better version of him, can.  She’ll scoff and say something derogatory against him, causing Ten to look a little putout.  This feeling of inadequacy stirs a pain in my heart for his sake.  I understand that his very purpose in life is to make his companions better, but they should never be so far gone that they force him to feel insufficient.  It appears, however, that River Song finds it impossible to not pull at that thread.

Her second appearance, another two-parter featuring the return of the Weeping Angels, reveals more of River Song to us.  She’s reunited with Eleven—the Doctor she’s obviously more familiar with.  With this level of comfort, more of her true characteristics are revealed to us.  If it’s possible, she’s even bossier than she had been with Ten.  She tells the Doctor where to go, what to do and when to do it, to the point that Amy Pond starts to note that River may just be his wife.  Amy Pond would know, of course, as her means of treating Rory aren’t exactly dissimilar to River’s treatment of the Doctor. 

            One thing that hasn’t changed from one face to the next is her apparent need to remind him of his shortfalls.  As soon as she’s on the TARDIS, she informs him that he can’t drive her correctly, resulting in the iconic sound we all love being written off as him leaving the breaks on.  This is obviously intended to represent what I suppose Moffat sees as typical bickering between a married couple.  He perhaps even thought he was being revolutionary, making it the wife who is supposedly the better driver.  Yes, how very condescendingly modernist of you, Sir Moffat.  Really, it just plays out as another item in the constantly growing list of things River Song is better at than everyone—but, in particular, the Doctor. 

            This leads me to the criticism I see most often about River Song.  She is often described as a Mary Sue.  A Mary Sue is, in some veins, similar to the Exceptional Woman.  This type of character lives in the mindset of ‘anything you can do, I can do better.’  She can drive the TARDIS better than even the Doctor.  Got some pesky impossibly invincible Silence on your hands?  Don’t worry; River Song can take out swarms of them in mere seconds, despite the fact that for an episode and a half leading up to this, everyone’s stood around scratching their heads, asking each other what they should do about the Silence problem.  But make sure you don’t tell the Doctor, he’d be ever so cross if he—supposed ardent advocate for peace—saw her whipping out that gun.

            But there are holes in her Mary Sue armor.  She was, after all, trained to kill the very man she obsesses over loves.  However, even then, she fights against the brainwashing to levels no mere human (well, technically she’s part Time Lord Lady, but that’s a whole other can of worms) would be able to.  She loves him so much, she’s even willing to disturb the track of history to keep him alive.  After all, destroying the flow of time is totally worth it if you’re in love.  It is also a fantastic foundation upon which to guilt the man you supposedly love into marrying you. 

            I say guilt because, in my opinion, that is precisely how the Doctor feels on the matter.  That final scene in The Wedding of River Song where he finally, after arguing with her for the bulk of the episode about not wanting to, concedes to marry her is almost physically painful for me to watch (seriously—hives almost become an issue.  Then again, those tend to sprout up at the mere mention of River Song for me).  It’s clear, to me at least, that he marries her out of necessity—to undo the rupture she’s put in time.  She, on the other hand, appears almost desperate, relieved and giddy, almost like a high school cheerleader who got the captain of the football team to go to the prom with her.  All this happiness at the thought of his submission to marry her.

She’s so happy; one has to wonder if she knew full and well what she was doing.  Did she purposely change the course of events, knowing that it would rupture time, and knowing that, as a result, he would marry her to undo her damage?  Hadn’t the whispering of his name so many meetings ago already handcuffed him to his future enough, as it were?  Apparently not, as she sought to make his marriage to her further unavoidable.

Moffat created River Song to give us a female superhero in her forty’s.  On the surface, he succeeds.  She’s sexy, strong (physically, at least.  I could argue her unrelenting apparent need to marry the Doctor paints her rather weak emotionally) and capable.  However, he just tries too hard and, in the process, gives us a character that pushes and demands that she is better, or that “her Doctor” is better.  One critic claimed that it was a breath of fresh air to have a female on Doctor Who who didn’t need to be saved by the Doctor at every turn.  It is true, River Song might not need to be saved by the Doctor, but her salvation is dependent on his livelihood—should she kill him, her very being will be destroyed.

From Bella to Katniss:  Is River a good role model?  Unlike her mother, (another can of worms that I just can’t bring myself to open) River Song certainly knows what she wants and goes after it, with no inhibitions.  However, she has too much zeal, going so far as to manipulate facts and events to insure she successfully grasps everything her heart desires. Some would say this makes her strong, confident.  In some sense, this is true.  But there is a line between going after what you want and manipulating it to happen.  Getting your dream job because you are qualified and driven is very different from sleeping with the boss to get the job.  While this is almost the exact opposite problem her daughter (again, just going to breeze past this issue and hope no one notices it) suffers from, it is equally appalling, if not more so.  Her drive to marry the Doctor is also disconcerting and the lengths she goes through to guarantee her success make her just a little too Dark Side to be deemed a good role model in my eyes.  That’s not to say those who gravitate towards the Dark Side can’t be good role models people.  For evidence of this, look for a future post on Spike from Buffy the Vampire Slayer. 
Role Model Rating:  2/10

Lorelai to Wonder Woman:  Is River relatable?  I’m afraid River is just too much the Exceptional Woman to be completely relatable.  She can do anything better than you, a fact she makes sure you know from top to bottom.  River can even complete tasks that are apparently impossible, and within a shockingly short amount of time, just based on the sheer fact that she is awesome.  Moffat strode to give us a hero in River Song and, in the process, gave us someone we can’t remotely relate to.

Relatability Rating:  3/10

No comments:

Post a Comment