Showing posts with label The Avengers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Avengers. Show all posts

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Jane Foster—Magic is Just Science We Don’t Understand Yet

**Due to recent misinterpretations of some one post from this blog, a disclaimer is now apparently necessary.  If this is your first visit to The Scratched Camera, please read the introductory post and discover, for yourself, that every typed word that follows is unabashedly my opinion and mine alone.  In said introductory post, which, shockingly, I did not simply type up for my own good health, I state that we all read events and characters with our own baggage in mind; no one observes with a perfectly clear lens—hence the name The Scratched Camera.  Therefore, it is completely your will to disagree with any material that follows, just as it is my will to agree and advocate for what is mine.**  ~End, irritating obligatory disclaimer~

Jane Foster—Thor Magic is Just Science We Don’t Understand Yet

            Unlike my previous posts centered on comic book characters (Natasha, Jean and Erik, I’m looking at you) preliminary research on Jane Foster was relatively simple and easy to acquire and understand (thanks, Wikipedia).  What I found was so conversely different from the Jane Foster I know, I felt compelled to include it in the post, although the article will, as always, focus on the film adaptations of the character. 

            Jane, according to her comic book origins, was a nurse, working for Dr. Donald Blake.  Blake was, of course, the alternate ego of Thor.  Poor Jane eventually fell for both of them, resulting in a messy, yet unnecessary, love triangle, before Blake revealed his true identity.  Thor took Jane to Asgard with him, where Odin granted her the immortality and powers of a god.  However, her abilities were quickly striped from her, as she failed to pass Odin’s test of bravery, showing fear at facing a beast entitled the Unknown. 

            Jane is returned to Earth, sans any memory of Thor or the power she had acquired there.  She eventually marries a mortal doctor, only to divorce him some time later when Thor is allowed to return to Earth.  She becomes a doctor herself, serving as a medical advisor to the Avengers.  

            While nursing is, of course, a very honorable and inspiring career, I think I prefer Jane as an astrophysicist, with three degrees and a headstrong attitude.  Marvel Enterprises brought in consultants from The Science and Entertainment Exchange to assist the screenwriters and director Lockhart Kenneth Branagh with applicable terminology for Asgard technologies.  The consultation was so enlightening, an updated version of Foster’s character was formulated for the film, thereby resulting in the Jane I am vastly more familiar with. 

            Jane has a deep affection and affinity for science.  She feels an intense loyalty to her subject matter and the resulting work; it serves as her biggest driving motivation in the films, surpassing any needy desire for approval or love, producing a character I can’t help but like.  In Thor, she spends the majority of the movie incredibly irate that S.H.I.E.L.D. has stolen taken the entirety of her life’s work; very few of her following actions aren’t motivated by her insistence that she needs to have her equipment and findings returned to her.  She helps Thor with the attempt to retrieve his hammer, but is only truly interested when he mentions he will also return all of her materials to her. 

Foster expresses a strong faith in science, associating the possibility of truth in Thor’s story as just another scientific finding; Thor has her admiration and conviction towards science to thank for her believing his ‘magic is just science thus forth unproven’ declaration. 

            Inherently with her driving scientific motivation comes a certain compulsory curiosity.  She believes in otherworldly beings, in the hopes that she can be the first to discover them—to venture where no other scientist has gone.  It is this curiosity that led her to the desert in Thor; that led her to wander off in The Dark World and stumble upon the Aether.  In Jane, there is an admirable courageousness in the face of the unknown (which is ironic, given original Jane’s deep fear at the beast called Unknown). 

            With this comes a dedication, a stubbornness.  She refuses to compromise anything in the name of science; no matter what other tasks she may have on her plate, science will always be her top priority.  When Darcy delivers the message of gravitational fluctuations during her date with Richard, it takes Jane approximately thirty seconds to decide to follow Darcy and leave behind her sea bass.  The intern expected as much, as she patiently waited the arrival of her friend from the parking lot.  This same clear choice in conviction is also evident in the received call from Richard once she and Thor find the other end of the Portal between the Nine Realms.  She clearly has little to no interest in actually speaking to Richard—she barely even acknowledges he’s speaking beyond the occasional “uh-huh,” and “no, don’t hang up!”  In turn, when Thor questions her who Richard is, she shrugs off the slight twinge of jealousy evident from the god with a disbelieving “really?”  To Jane, Thor’s potential for envy only takes up time that could be dedicated to science and the troubleshooting of their newest problem. 

            Along these same lines, Foster notably fails to excessively apologize for her discovery of the Aether.  Her infection at the hands of the Infinity Stone causes a lot of problems—Frigga dies, Malekith is hostile towards the Asgardians, destroying a large portion of their Realm in the process, soldiers die, prisoners escape and all hell breaks lose.  Regardless of this destruction, Jane apologizes exactly once in the entire film for her acquisition of the Aether. 

            I do not mean to say that Jane is arrogant and selfish to the point where she refuses to admit she made a mistake.  Had she failed to apologize at all throughout the film that would’ve perhaps been the case.  However, as she does, it eliminates a potential for a swelled ego to be amongst Jane’s qualities.  Conversely, I believe it is Foster’s dedication to science that prohibits her from apologizing earlier.  Jane, as a strong and committed scientist with an enthusiastic love of the unknown, can’t rationalize apologizing for something inherent to her nature and personality.  In short, she’s rather unapologetic.

            However, this does not mean Jane lacks compassion and understanding.  Simply, Foster knows her worth.  Yes, she may be human, but that does not make her inferior to anyone else.  This stance is applicable even to the King of Asgard, who receives a healthy dose of attitude from Jane at his equating her to a goat.  Even after she learns of his title and position, she demands to receive no less than the respect she deserves. 

            To Jane, she deserves respect on two levels.  Her intelligence as an astrophysicist would typically take precedence.  However, in front of Thor’s family, against the man who raised Loki to become the man who wrecked havoc on New York City so very recently, Jane does not speak to him as a scientist—she speaks to him as a human, as a part of a race that has suffered at the hands of one of the king’s own.  Just because she’s a human, Foster rationalizes, doesn’t make her inferior. 

            Her stance against Odin is quite remarkable, as he could quite literally squash her like a bug, should he choose to do so.  Regardless, she holds her head high and insists she receives the regard basic human rights inform us we all are privy to. 

            However, Loki is truly the one responsible.  When faced with the man guilty with the deaths of countless humans in New York City, Jane doesn’t hesitate to slap him immediately and issue a scathing “that’s for New York,” showing us her strong sense of right and wrong—to her, Loki may be a god, but he is not above punishment.  Once again Foster displays fearlessness in the face of the unknown; other than the accounts of the attack on New York, she really knows very little about the abilities of Odin and Loki.  With such volatile opponents, anything could happen, a fact that doesn’t seem to bother Jane in the least. 

            Some would argue that Jane is protected by Thor and the infection infesting her, (which, really, is only protecting itself, not necessarily her) and that it is far easier to be brazen when faced with the fact that no harm can come to you.  I would agree that Thor is quick enough to potentially deflect any attack that may come Jane’s way, but I wouldn’t go so far as to assume that, should a fight break out, he’d be the absolute victor. 

            This theory is also disproven by her involvement in the final conflict with Malekith at the end of The Dark World.  The infection has been removed from her system; Thor is rather busy fighting Malekith.  If the above theory had been correct, this would render Jane defenseless and useless in terms of contributing to the final showdown on the streets of London. 

            But Jane’s still got her brains.  All along her mind has been her greatest asset and it doesn’t fail her in the confrontation with Malekith.  The fight that rages in The Dark World is perhaps one of my favorites; the combined effort of the hero and heroine to take down the villain satisfies my feminist side far better than the bulk of final fights in superhero movies.  Jane may not have the physical strength to conquer Malekith, but there was no way Thor could defeat Nine the villain without her assistance.  Thor and Foster work together as a cohesive whole to win, forming a united front that is unheard of from the supposed romantic interest of the film.  Jane even has the final word as she punches the appropriate button and sends Malekith back to the hell that is Svartalfheim. 

From Bella to Katniss:  Is Jane a good role model?  Where the original Jane was revolutionary in terms of achieving the position of doctor, this Jane is innovative as she is a successful member of a branch of the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) line of occupations.  There are very few women in media that show an aptitude towards science or similar applications.  On that note, Jane doesn’t just show an aptitude towards the field, she is incredibly intelligent, with three degrees on the subject.  As there are few women portrayed in this way, Jane could serve as an excellent example for females who wish to find success in a STEM field.  Foster also has a firm grip on her priorities—Ron wouldn’t say she needs to sort her’s out, I’m sure of it, although he can be rather stupid on issues such as this—she cares for Thor, even acknowledges having a deep affection for him.  However, she never allows this to rule her life.  In Thor, science, her work and her equipment were still her top priorities, no matter what her status with Thor may have been.  When Thor disappears, Jane grieves the relationship, but doesn’t allow it to control her life.  She takes herself out of the dating equation for a while, certainly, as is the common practice—particularly when one has fallen for and, correspondingly lost, someone as so very attractive as Chris Hemsworth—but eventually moves on.  We see her date with Richard and, while it may be unsatisfactory to her, she is at least continuing to look; she hasn’t allowed her entire life to be derailed by the loss of the god.  Likewise, if the relationship attempts to inhibit her scientific tasks in any way, she’s quick to reassert herself upon the situation and insure her priorities remain in tact.  Finally, she’s quite unapologetic, particularly in regards to her priorities and the respect she believes she deserves.  She may come off as crass at times, but she knows what she wants and she isn’t afraid to seek it out. 
Role Model Rating:  9/10

From Lorelai to Wonder Woman:  Is Jane relatable?  Jane serves to humanize Thor, particularly in the first film, where he is arrogant and egotistical.  Her simple and short response of “you ask nicely,” to his demand of more coffee with an accompanying breaking of his mug, shockingly works as he gets as close to an apology as he probably ever has.  Conversely, Thor isn’t the only one to grow and improve once they meet; towards her initial introduction to the god, Jane giggles like a schoolgirl talking to the quarterback nearly every time he implies needing her assistance—a habit, although understandable, (he’s a god) she thankfully grows out of in short order.  These repeated small encounters between her and the Thor reminds the audience that, despite the fact that Foster is brilliant, she’s still human at her very core.  To add to her relatability factor is the character’s ability to be both steadfast and vulnerable at the same time.  When Thor disappears for two years, Jane is very saddened by his lost—to which I say, wouldn’t you?  Look at him!  However, upon his return, she doesn’t tearfully run and embrace him—she slaps him across the face and demands to know where he was.  Some may call this clingy, demanding he explain his time to her, despite the fact that he was obviously in New York—a fact The Avengers informs us she was certainly aware of.  However, I disagree.  Jane listens to his explanation and nods, able to acknowledge that, as excuses go, that’s a pretty good one.  Her reaction, to me, isn’t needy; it is an affirmation of her understanding of her worth—she knows she deserves an explanation and, therefore, she knows no other option than to seek it out.   Finally, it’s refreshing to have a heroine who is on the short side, and yet is practical enough to refuse to wear high heels.  The only exception to this is when she’s in her “lady clothes,” an understandable concession that proves her dislike of whatever a typical “lady clothes” wardrobe would entail.  For those of us who favor jeans and fail to see the practicality behind dresses, it’s a breath of fresh air. 

Relatability Rating:  8/10

Monday, February 17, 2014

Natasha Romanoff--I've Got Red on my Ledger. I'd Like to Work it Out. (Requested)


**Due to recent misinterpretations of some one post from this blog, a disclaimer is now apparently necessary.  If this is your first visit to The Scratched Camera, please read the introductory post and discover, for yourself, that every typed word that follows is unabashedly my opinion and mine alone.  In said introductory post, which, shockingly, I did not simply type up for my own good health, I state that we all read events and characters with our own baggage in mind; no one observes with a perfectly clear lens—hence the name The Scratched Camera.  Therefore, it is completely your will to disagree with any material that follows, just as it is my will to agree and advocate for what is mine.**  ~End, irritating obligatory disclaimer~

Natasha Romanoff—I’ve Got Red on My Ledger.  I’d Like to Wipe Work it Out

            I’d like to preface this post with a specific disclaimer.  In all my nerdy habits, I’m afraid I can’t count comic books amongst them.  I have never read a comic book in my life, despite the deep devotion I feel towards superheroes.  That being said, this post will focus on the film adaptation versions of the Black Widow—particularly on her role in The Avengers. 

            I went into The Avengers with high hopes for Natasha Romanoff.  It had been a very long time since I had seen Iron Man 2 and, oddly enough I chose to watch it once, instead of watching it obsessively as I tend to do with movies, therefore, I almost felt as if I were being reintroduced to the character with this newest addition to the Marvel movie family.  I knew Joss Whedon was penning the script.  With this came some very high expectations.

            I’ve been a huge fan of Whedon for years.  I watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer while it was on air years ago.  I stuck through Angel, despite how incredibly depressing it was could be.  I hate how short-lived Firefly was; I could’ve spent years watching Captain Mal Reynolds frolic about the universe with his makeshift crew. 

            In all of these universes, one universal truth is undeniable.  Whedon women are a force to be reckoned with.  Knowing this, I simply couldn’t wait to see what he did with Natasha Romanoff.

            I have a vague memory of her role in Iron Man 2.  I recall several vague sexual harassment jokes, not to mention the occasional blatant ogling joke on Tony’s behalf.  While there’s no denying that Scarlett Johansson is a very attractive woman, there is certainly much more potential for her character than that. 

The Avengers really took the opportunity to explore this.  Even in a movie full of big characters and even bigger plots, Whedon still takes time to explore some of the deeper, darker sides to her.  We learn that she is a highly trained spy, and that she started working at a very young age.  While she may be devoid of superpowers, she never fails to carry her own weight.  In a team comprised of serious heavy-hitters, she never feels out of place or as if she is a burden.  She finds a way to fit right in and contributes a bulk of the defense, fighting on the streets of New York for the bulk of the battle.  In the words of Johansson, “she’s not in the cast simply to be a romantic foil or eye candy.  She’s there to fight.”

            In a sense, Johansson seems to be sniping a bit at her representation in Iron Man 2.  From what I can recall of her role in the film, romantic foil and eye candy describe Romanoff to a tee.  She is every bit the opposite of Pepper Potts, and to question Johansson’s attractiveness would be silly.  However, she’s saying that her character is more than that; that she deserves more credit than simply becoming a trophy to look at.  I couldn’t agree more.

            The Avengers sees to this.  From her opening scene, it is clear she is more than just eye candy.  Sure, the male in the room alludes to wanting this evening to end in sex.  But, immediately, Black Widow is having none of that.  “I know how you wanted this evening to end.  Believe me, this is better.”  Romanoff would genuinely rather be tied to a chair and tortured than subjected to sleeping with him.  I agree with her, as I’m guessing the interaction would take place with a mite less than consent.  But the line is pure Whedon-ism:  it’s the woman striving to control of a virtually incontrollable situation. 

            The scene only travels onwards and upwards from this line.  Romanoff seems to be losing ground as her information seems to be outdated.  However, I know better; my previous experience with Whedon has me suspicious of the interaction—I know there’s another level here I’m just not seeing yet. 

            Romanoff, not to mention Whedon, doesn’t disappoint.  She tells Coulson the idiot who is supposedly interrogating her is giving her everything she needs to know.  It is then that the audience fully catches up, and we are introduced to my favorite of the Black Widow’s talents.  Romanoff has twisted and manipulated the entire conversation to insure that the man thought he was in control.  She made him feel like he had some power over her, due to his supposed advanced intellect.  Romanoff allowed this power to go to his head, fusing him with an arrogance, an ego so swelled, he felt the need to show off just how stupid he thought she really was and, in the process, revealed all the intel she needed; he fell right into the palm of her hands. 

            This isn’t the only time she uses this particular skill.  She turns this ploy on Loki a bit later in the film, but with a new twist.  Instead of merely addressing his arrogance, she focuses in on his notion of superiority.  Loki views Natasha as particularly inferior, since she is both human and a woman.  He looks at her and sees a little girl begging for approval. 

            He couldn’t be more wrong about her.  She knows she has skeletons spiders in her closet; she knows she’s done some horrible things in her life.  There’s nothing she can do to take them back, so she’s forced to make her peace with it.  However, it works to her advantage to allow him to think that, so she does.  She plays the pouty-girl so well that he just falls right into her spider web and, in the process, lays out the most crucial part of his plan.  Her gathering this intelligence allows S.H.I.E.L.D. to prepare Banner for Loki’s manipulation of him.  By doing so, they are able to help him fight for their side. 

            Gathering Banner isn’t the only reason this scene is essential.  We learn a lot of things about the Black Widow in two or three short minutes.  Loki runs off a list of bad deeds Barton has told him in their time together.  Essentially, he’s bringing out those spiders, dusting them off and putting them on display for her viewing pleasure.  It’s made clear to us that, at one time, Romanoff was not necessarily a champion for the white hats. 

Upon repeated viewings of The Avengers, I began to ponder the repercussions of this discovery.  Does this mean we can’t trust her?  What is to stop her from switching sides of the track once again?  Why has she not chosen to resume her work as a spy?  She was clearly very talented at it, so what holds her here? 

            Preliminary research on the matter—thanks, Wikipedia—references that her reasoning for remaining with S.H.I.E.L.D. was her developing feelings for Barton.  While there are certainly hints of this in The Avengers, it is not a focal point.  Certainly, the mention of Barton’s compensation at the hands of Loki sends Romanoff into one of the best choreographed and compelling action sequences I think I’ve ever been witness to.  However, for Johansson’s Widow, I suspect something as simple as love wouldn’t be enough to motivate her to remain.

            She tells Loki as much.  Love is child’s play.  She may feel something for him, but she needs some deeper, internally driven motivation for such a definitive course of action.  Personally, I think she has red in her ledger and she’d like to work it out. 

From Bella to Katniss:  Is Natasha a good role model?  The Black Widow represents several concepts I can get behind.  She’s tough and has no trouble defending herself.  I could even argue that she’s a better fighter than her super-human endowed buddies, as she is just as successful as they are, without any of their added super-human assistance.  Romanoff even achieves what her comrades can’t—closing the portal and bringing the fight to a final close.  She’s very intelligent and has a sharp sense of self-awareness, two talents she uses to turn her sordid past, insecurities and shortcomings against those who challenge her.  In this process, she uses the misconceptions her arrogant male opponents have about women—that we are merely stupid, frail, vain, emotional, manipulative creatures—and turns it around on them. I’ve never seen a character manipulate a conversation as well as the Black Widow.  Romanoff is also far too intelligent to worry herself over appearances—she worries very little whether her hair is in perfect shape or if her make up starts to run while in battle.  It’s refreshing to see a character who looks like she’s been fighting—a complaint I often had about Buffy.  Finally, her plot very easily could’ve taken a romantic tone, leading us down the slippery slope that is Bella-dom, but, in the words of Johansson, “there’s no time for romance.  We’ve got shit to avenge.”
Role Model Rating:  8/10

From Lorelai to Wonder Woman:  Is Natasha relatable?  Superheroes can often be difficult to relate to—hence the use of Wonder Woman at the end of this scale.  However, if we look past the fighting and the work of a spy, we see a deeper, darker side to Natasha that has definite relatability.  She has a dark past, one she can never escape.  She’s made some mistakes, mistakes she now has no other choice than to live with.  This, at its very core, is relatable.  Who hasn’t made a mistake they regret, a mistake they wish with all their heart they could retract?  We are informed that Natasha also knows what it is like to be unmade.  While I have no doubt that she’s referencing to some deep-seated spy retraction of some kind, the concept is still not unreachable to the every-day person.  Personally, I have suffered through trials that I knew would never leave me as the same person I was when I entered the ordeal.  And I had been right.  We all experience things that fundamentally alter us.  However, until we know the extent of the Widow’s suffering, something will always be mysterious about the representation of herself she puts forth.  I have hopes that the recently announced Widow solo film will address these very issues.  Already I can’t wait—is it 2015, yet? 
Relatability Rating:  6/10